A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst future neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted national consideration subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier as well as Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to construct their household house. The case has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being manufactured by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their arranging permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such spots are matter to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, notably in a sensitive coastal ecosystem such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which is partly developed, is in the right posture. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal planning disputes, where views of The ocean are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-higher water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture which includes since turn out to be emblematic of the intensity from the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water in the course of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the website became Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of actions were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track Rene Collier and Paul Feely record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute during the lawful timeline.
For the core of the dispute is really a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as produced, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and conditions connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is motivated by concern for environmental protection and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their lengthy-standing relationship to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and accepted programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from really various Experienced backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.